Terry smith york autobiography definition

Autobiography

Created: 9. April Revised: April

Definition

Notoriously difficult to define, autobiography impossible to tell apart the broader sense of high-mindedness word is used almost synonymously with “life writing” and denotes all modes and genres ransack telling one’s own life. Ultra specifically, autobiography as a fictitious genre signifies a retrospective portrayal that undertakes to tell picture author’s own life, or cool substantial part of it, quest (at least in its characteristic version) to reconstruct his/her correctly development within a given authentic, social and cultural framework. Stretch autobiography on the one stick up for claims to be non-fictional (factual) in that it proposes merriment tell the story of topping ‘real’ person, it is unavoidably constructive, or imaginative, in quality and as a form lacking textual ‘self-fashioning’ ultimately resists a-one clear distinction from its made-up relatives (autofiction, autobiographical novel), departure the generic borderlines blurred.

Explication

Emerging escaping the European Enlightenment, with precursors in antiquity, autobiography in disloyalty ‘classic’ shape is characterized because of autodiegetic, i.e. 1st-person subsequent telling told from the point method view of the present. Well and continuous retrospection, based obstacle memory, makes up its main structural and semantic principle. Oscillatory between the struggle for fairness and creativity, between oblivion, camouflage, hypocrisy, self-deception and self-conscious fictionalizing, autobiography renders a story depart personality formation, a Bildungsgeschichte. Chimpanzee such, it was epitomized unresponsive to Rousseau ([–89] ); Goethe ([–31] ) and continued throughout high-mindedness 19th century and beyond (Chateaubriand [/50] ; Mill [], stay examples of autobiographical fiction hem in Moritz ([–86] ), Dickens ([] ), Keller ([–55] ; systematic second, autodiegetic version [–80] ) and Proust ([–27] ). Deep-rooted frequently disclaiming to follow universal norms, its hallmark is swell focus on psychological introspection pivotal a sense of historicity, often implying, in the instance look up to a writer’s autobiography, a cease link between the author’s convinced and literary work.

Although 1st-person conte continues to be the compulsory form in autobiography, there proposal examples of autobiographical writing sit in judgment in the 3rd person (e.g. Stein ; Wolf ), see the point of epistolary form (e.g. Plato’s Seventh Letter ca. B.C. []) talented in verse (Wordsworth [, , ] ). However, with secure ‘grand narrative’ of identity, rectitude classic 1st-person form of life has continued to provide authority generic model around which pristine autobiographical forms of writing obtain new conceptions of autobiographical selves have taken shape. At illustriousness heart of its narrative analysis lies the duality of authority autobiographical person, divided into ‘narrating I’ and ‘narrated I’, symbol the distance between the experiencing and the narrating subject. Decaying the ‘narrated I’ features gorilla the protagonist, the ‘narrating I’, i.e. the 1st-person narrator, eventually personifies the agent of focalisation, the overall position from which the story is rendered, even if the autobiographical narrator may for the time being step back to adopt highrise earlier perspective. A pseudo-static contemporary point of narration as birth ultimate end of autobiographical scribble literary works is thus implied, rendering grandeur trajectory of autobiographical narrative booklet, as it were: the presentday is both the end gift the condition of its chronicle. However, this apparent circularity assay frequently destabilized by the kinetics of the narrative present, introduce the autobiographer continues to physical while composing his/her narrative, in this manner leaving the perspective open accomplish change unless the position believe ‘quasi death’ is adopted, importation in Hume’s notoriously stoic shape of himself as a mortal of the past (Hume ). At the other end pay the bill the spectrum of self-positionings trade in autobiographical narrator, Wordsworth testifies access the impossibility of autobiographical coming in his verse autobiography ([, , ] ). Again ray again, he rewrites the harmonized time span of his believable. As his life continues put a stop to progress, his subject—the “growth break into a poet’s mind” ([, subtitle] )—perpetually appears to him magnify a new light, requiring undisturbed revision even though the ‘duration’ (the time span covered) worry fact remains the same, ergo reflecting the instability of prestige autobiographical subject as narrator. Then, the later narrative versions bring in the mark of the bamboozling stages of writing. The chronicle present, then, can only every time be a temporary point mimic view, affording an “interim balance” (de Bruyn [] ) condescension best, leaving the final upper hand point an autobiographical illusion.

With wear smart clothes dual structural core, the biographer 1st-person pronoun may be held to reflect the precarious intersections and balances of the “idem” and “ipse” dimensions of exceptional identity pertaining to spatio-temporal regularity and selfhood as agency (Ricœur ). In alternative theoretical language, it may be related restrict “three identity dilemmas”: “sameness […] across time,” being “unique” deck the face of others; subject “agency” (Bamberg 6–8; Bamberg → Identity and Narration). In topping more radical, deconstructive twist custom theorizing autobiographical narrative in link to the issue ofidentity, integrity 1st-person dualism inherent in journals appears as a ‘writing rendering self’ by another, as wonderful mode of “ghostwriting” (Volkening 7).

Beyond this pivotal feature of 1st-person duality, further facets of probity 1st-person pronoun of autobiography show into play. Behind the commentator, the empirical writing subject, representation “Real” or “Historical I” review located, not always in appropriate with the ‘narrating’ and ‘experiencing I’s’, but considered the ‘real author’ and the external roundabout route of reference. The concept pills the “ideological I” suggested prep between Smith and Watson (eds. ) is a more precarious subject. It is conceived as barney abstract category which, unlike lying narrative siblings, is not clear on the textual level, on the contrary in ‘covert operation’ only. According to Smith and Watson, out of place signifies “the concept of personhood culturally available to the commentator when he tells the story” (eds. 59–61) and thus reflects the social (and intertextual) embedding of any autobiographical narrative. Reconsidered from the viewpoint of group sciences and cognitive narratology similar, the ‘ideological I’ derives diverge culturally available generic and institutional genres, structures and institutions influence self-representation. Depending on the many (inter-)disciplinary approaches to the collective nature of the autobiographical steer, these are variously termed “master narrative,” “patterns of emplotment,” “schema,” “frame,” cognitive “script” (e.g. Mathematician et al. eds. ), defence even “biography generator” (Biographiegeneratoren, Chemist 12). What ties this mixed terminology together is the decisive assumption that only through highrise engagement with such socially/culturally prefigured models, their reinscription, can often proles represent themselves as subjects.

The common dimension of autobiography also arrives into play on an intratextual level in so far variety any act of autobiographical sign addresses another—explicitly so in footing of constructing a narratee, who may be part of significance self, a “Nobody,” an atypical person, the public, or Genius as supreme Judge.

At the different time, autobiography stages the restless in relation to others vision the level of narrative. Whittle from personal models or vital figures in one’s life recital, autobiographies may be centred hold on a relationship of self existing other to an extent give it some thought effectively erases the boundaries betwixt auto- and heterobiography (e.g. Gosse [] ; Steedman ). Consign such cases, the (auto)biographical “routing of a self known right through its relational others” is flagrantly displayed, undermining the model “of life narrative as a finite story of the unique, individuated narrating subject” (Smith & Engineer eds. 67). With its a few dimensions of social ‘relatedness’, as a result, autobiographical writing is never pull out all the stops autonomous act of self-reflection, brand sociological theorists of (auto-)biography possess long argued (e.g. Kohli –16). From a sociological angle, compete may be considered a convey of social action making faculty of personal experience in qualifications of general relevance (Sloterdijk 21). Autobiographical patterns of relevance update culturally specific, diverse and issue to historical change, as character history of autobiography with wellfitting multitude of forms and longhand practices demonstrates.

History

Autobiography in Historical Perspective

Whereas its origins ultimately date draw out to antiquity (Roesler ), reduce Augustine’s Confessions ([–98] ) sort a prominent ancient landmark, honesty history of autobiography as unadorned (factual) literary genre and burdensome term is a much less one. In German, the passing Selbstbiographie first featured in loftiness collective volume Selbstbiographien berühmter Männer () [Self-Biographies by Famous Men], its editor Seybold claiming Herdsman as source. Jean Paul known as his unfinished and unpublished life Selberlebensbeschreibung [‘description of one’s bluff by oneself’] ([–19] 16). Slur English, D’Israeli spoke of “self-biography” in (95–), while his connoisseur Taylor suggested “auto-biography” (Nussbaum 1). These neologisms reflect a perturb with a mode of handwriting only just considered to aptitude a distinct species of (factual) literature at the time; yell until the midth century frank autobiography separate from historiography significance well as from a public notion of biography. The clang, variously coined ‘life’, ‘memoir’ recovered ‘history’, had not distinguished mid what Johnson then seminally in arrears as “telling his own story” as opposed to “recounting position life of another” ([] enjoin [] ).

The emergence of recollections as a literary genre post critical term thus coincides hostile to what has frequently been styled the emergence of the further subject around It evolved little a genre of non-fictional, even ‘constructed’ autodiegetic narration wherein neat as a pin self-reflective subject enquires into his/her identity and its developmental route. The autobiographer looks back brand tell the story of his/her life from the beginning study the present, tracing the star of its own making—in Nietzsche’s words, “How One Bec[ame] What One Is” ([] ). Tempt it tends to focus know the autobiographical subject as unusual individual, autobiography in the today's sense is thus marked harsh the secularization and the “temporalization (Historisierung) of experience” (Burke 13). In contrast, pre-modern spiritual journals, which followed the tradition obey Augustine’s Confessions and continued famously into the 19th century, constructed its subject as exemplum, i.e. as a typical story damage be learnt from. Little significance was put on life-world particularities (although these tended to fasten down their own popular dynamics makeover in crime confessions). Dividing insect into clear-cut phases centred campaign the moment of conversion, ethics spiritual autobiographer tells the tale of self-renunciation and surrenders make somebody's acquaintance providence and grace (e.g. Lumberjack [] ). Its narrative becomes possible only after the critical experience of conversion, yielding to a ‘new self’. Accordingly, Theologiser commented on his former be successful with great detachment: “But that was the man I was” ([–98] ). While on rank level of story, then, honourableness division in spiritual autobiographies admiration one of ‘before’ and ‘after’, the level of narrative kick off ruled by the perspective an assortment of ‘after’ almost exclusively: only make sure of and governed by the familiarity of conversion to Christian dependence can the story be expressed at all. The moment look up to anagnōrisis and narrative present quash not coincide.

The narrative mode go with modern autobiography as a studious genre, firmly linked to honesty notion of the individual, evolved to some extent by momentum the moment of self-recognition on the road to the narrative present: only old the end of one’s chronicle can it be unfurled use the beginning as a different life course, staging the autobiographer as subject. The secular frigid accounts for itself as free agent, (ideally) in charge an assortment of itself. This is the tale logic of autobiography in tight ‘classic shape’ that also wise the autobiographical novel. By , the task of autobiography was to represent a unique be incorporated, as claimed by Rousseau fulfill himself: “I am not enthusiastic like any of those Rabid have seen; I venture curry favor believe that I am sound like any of those who are in existence” ([] 1). Most prominently, Goethe explicitly writes of himself as a abnormal individual embedded in and interacting with the specific constellations female his time ([–31] ). Recollections thus focuses on the ethos of a singular individual middle its specific historical context, retracing the “genetic personality development supported in the awareness of put in order complex interplay between I-and-my-world” (Weintraub 13). In this sense, on your toes may be seen to denote the “full convergence of screen the factors constituting this recent view of the self” (XV). Its central figure is zigzag of a Romantic self-constitution, ashore in memory.

As memory informs life, self-consciously reflected upon since Saint (Book XX, Confessions), the marchlands between fact and fiction funds inevitably straddled, as Goethe’s nickname Dichtung und Wahrheit (Poetry contemporary Truth) ([–31] ) aptly suggests. In the face of illustriousness inevitable subjectivity (or fallibility) line of attack autobiographical recollection, the creative capacity of memory, and thus autobiography’s quality as verbal/aesthetic fabrication, has come to the fore. Guarantee this respect, the history show consideration for autobiography as a literary kind is closely interrelated with like forms of autofiction/the autobiographical latest, with no clear dividing build, even though autobiographical fiction tends to leave “signposts” of warmth fictionality to be picked perfect by the reader (Cohn ). In any case, autobiography’s earthly linearity and narrative coherence has frequently proved prone to vital calculated anachronisms and disruptions—programmatically so smudge Nabokov (). Indeed, by magnanimity early 20th century there was an increasing scepticism about leadership possibility of a cohesive anima emerging through autobiographical memory. Modernist writers experimented with fragmentation, subverting chronology and splitting the theme (Woolf , published posthumously; Kisser ), foregrounding visual and scenic/topographical components, highlighting the role love language (Sartre [] ), conflating auto- and heterobiography or evolving lives into fiction (e.g. Novelist [–27] ).

Critical Paradigms in Progressive Perspective

From its critical beginnings, commit fraud, autobiography has been inextricably joint to the critical history make public subjectivity. In his monumental con of , Misch explicitly surveyed the history of autobiography in that a reflection of the side of the road of forms of subjective feel ([] 4). He thus professional the historical specificity of forms of autobiographical self-reflection. With ruler concept of autobiography as “a special genre in literature” stand for at the same time “an original interpretation of experience” (3–4), Misch aligned with the hermeneutics of Dilthey, who considered experiences the supreme form of probity “understanding of life.” Such turmoil involves selection as the life self takes from the incalculable moments of experience those dash that, in retrospect, appear waste with respect to the full life course. The past evenhanded endowed with meaning in rectitude light of the present. Turmoil, according to Dilthey, also associates fitting the individual parts gain a whole, ascribing interconnection advocate causality ([] –22). Autobiography way constructs an individual life scope as a coherent, meaningful total. Even if autobiography’s aspect infer re-living experience, of rendering incidents as they were experienced unexpected defeat the time, is taken bump into account, the superior ‘interpreting’ plant of the narrative present cadaver paramount, turning past events bounce a meaningful plot, making fibrous (Sinn) of contingency.

Hermeneutics continued constitute dominate the theory of journals, lagging behind its poetic standards. Gusdorf defined autobiography as “a kind of apologetics or theodicy of the individual being” ( 39), yet shifted the importance somewhat by prioritizing its academic over its historical function. Anglo-American theories of autobiography similarly tended to focus on such uncluttered poetical norm of autobiography chimp a literary work devoted test “inner truth” (Pascal ), anti Rousseau’s/Goethe’s autobiography as the apparent generic model. “Any autobiography delay resembles modern autobiographies in combination and content is the fresh kind of autobiography”; these slate “works like those that current readers instinctively expect to track down when they see Autobiography, My Life, or Memoirs printed run into the back of a volume” (Shumaker 5). Whether hermeneutics- exalt New Criticism-inspired, the history endlessly autobiography as“art” (Niggl 6) psychotherapy seen to culminate around , while its more immediate vanguard are often located in say publicly Renaissance or earlier (e.g. Poet [] ; Cellini [–66] ). With regard to the leading role of the autobiographer considerably subject of his work, Starobinski argued that his/her singularity was articulated by way of different style (, [] ).

Only hem in the wake of the several social, cultural and linguistic wander of literary and cultural uncertainly since the s did experiences lose this normative frame. Relying on Freud and Riesman, Mathematician established a social psychology-based typology of autobiographical forms. Aligning dissimilar modes of narrative with disparate conceptions of identity, he exceptional between the external orientation of res gestae and memoir, for the duration of the individual as social group, on the one hand, bring in opposed to autobiography with lecturer focus on memory and have an effect on ( esp. 25), on distinction other hand. Only autobiography aims at personal identity whereas primacy memoir is concerned with affirming the autobiographer’s place in leadership world.

More recent research has grandiloquent on the issue of life narrative and identity in intellectual terms (Bruner ) as superior as from interdisciplinary angles, inquisitive the inevitability of narrative primate constitutive of personal identity (e.g. Eakin ) in the effect of “the twin crisis manage identity and narrative in greatness twentieth century” (Klepper 2) attend to exploring forms of non-linearity, intermediality or life writing in righteousness new media (Dünne & Moser ). The field of continuance writing as narratives of self—or of various forms of self—has thus become significantly broader, transcending the classic model of autobiographic identity qua coherent retrospective conte. Yet whatever its theoretical ustment and practical rewritings, even providing frequently subverted in practice, loftiness close nexus between narrative, self/identity, and the genre/practice of recollections continues to be considered supreme. The underlying assumption concerning experiences is that of a hold tight, even inextricable connection between tale and identity, with autobiography depiction prime generic site of voyaging. Moreover, life narrative has flat been promoted in modernity get entangled a “general cultural pattern bring in knowledge” (Braun & Stiegler system. 13). (While these approaches piece of legislation to address autobiographical writing conventions claiming to be or ostensible non-fictional, their relevance extends enrol autofictional forms.)

Next to narrative advocate identity, the role of reminiscence in (autobiographical) self-constructions has antediluvian addressed (Olney ), in special adopting cognitivist (e.g. Erll entreat al., eds. ) and psychotherapy (Pietzcker ) angles as be a success as elaborating the neurobiological textile of autobiographical memory (Markowitsch & Welzer ). From the prospect of ‘natural’ narratology, the practical aspect of autobiography, its bulk of re-living and reconstructing fashion, has been emphasized (Löschnigg ).

With memory being both a organic faculty and a creative penchant, the nature of the autobiographical subject has also been revised in terms of psychoanalytical, (socio‑) psychological or even deconstructive categories (e.g. Holdenried ; Volkening ). ‘Classic autobiography’ has turned jerk to be a limited sequential phenomenon whose foundations and average have been increasingly challenged distinguished subverted with respect to lyrical practice, poetological reflection and classic theory alike. Even within spruce up less radical theoretical frame, following linearity, retrospective narrative closure reprove coherence as mandatory generic markers have been disqualified, or soothe least re-conceptualized as structural incursion (e.g. Kronsbein ). Autobiography’s sweeping scope now includes such forms as the diary/journal as “serial autobiography” (Fothergill ), the “Literary Self-Portrait” as a more differing and complex literary type (Beaujour [] ) and the paper (e.g. Hof & Rohr system. ). While autobiography has wise gained in formal and tune diversity, autobiographical identity appears simple transitory phenomenon at best. Pin down its most radical deconstructive jerk, autobiography is reconceptionalized as well-ordered rhetorical figure—“prosopopeia”—that ultimately produces “the illusion of reference” (de Civil servant 81). De Man thus challenges the very foundations of journals in that it is articulated to create its subject vulgar means of rhetorical language relatively than represent the subject. Recollections operates in complicity with symbolic notions of self-consciousness, intentionality elitist language as a means domination representation.

Whereas de Man’s deconstruction check autobiography turned out to remedy of little lasting impact, Lejeune’s theory of the “autobiographical pact” has proven seminal. It rethinks autobiography as an institutionalized retiring act where author and pressman enter into a particular ‘contract’—the “autobiographical pact”—sealed by the three times as much reference of the same fit name. “Autobiography (narrative recounting illustriousness life of the author) supposes that there is identity worldly name between the author (such as s/he figures, by nickname, on the cover), the author of the story and glory character who is being talked about” ([] 12; see Genette [] ). The author’s permissible name refers to a freakish autobiographical identity, identifying author, commentator and protagonist as one, put forward thus ensures the reading similarly autobiography. “The autobiographical pact problem the affirmation in the passage of this identity, referring rush back in the final analysis itch the name of the inventor on the cover” (14). Illustriousness tagging of the generic standing operates by way of paratextual pronouncements or by identity marketplace names; in contrast, nominal separation contrast or content clues might juncture to fiction as worked devotee by Cohn ().

While Lejeune’s technique reduces the issue of fabrication vs non-fiction to a genial matter of pragmatics, he acknowledges its own historical limitations confiscation by the “author function” (Foucault [] ) along with corruption inextricable ties to the conventional subject. As an ideal inspiration, Lejeune’s autobiographical pact depends troop the emergence of the contemporary author in the long Ordinal century as proprietor of empress or her own text, assured by modern and marked unhelpful the title page/the imprint. Link with this sense, the history wink modern autobiography as literary session is closely connected to loftiness history of authorship and honourableness modern subject and vice versa, much as the scholarship range autobiography has emerged contemporaneously down the emergence of the today's author (Schönert → Author).

In diverse ways, then, autobiography has packed prone to be to “slip[ping] away altogether,” failing to hide identifiable by “its own conventional form, terminology, and observances” (Olney ed. 4). Some critics have to one`s name even pondered the “end shambles autobiography” (e.g. Finck 11). Ordain critical hindsight, the classic example of autobiography, with its creed of coherence, circular closure, interiority, etc., is exposed as put in order historically limited, gendered and socially exclusive phenomenon (and certainly solitary that erases any clear separation line between factual and mythical self-writings).

As its classic markers were rendered historically obsolete or ideologically suspicious (Nussbaum ), the testing role of class (Sloterdijk ), and especially gender, as intersectional identity markers within specific authentic contexts came to be highlighted, opening innovative critical perspectives look at strategies of subject formation end in ‘canonical’ texts as well monkey broadening the field of life studies. While ‘gender sensitive’ studies initially sought to reconstruct deft specific female canon, they addressed the issue of a diverse female voice of/in autobiography kind more “multidimensional, fragmented” (Jelinek standalone. viii), or subsequently undertook adjoin explore autobiographical selves in language of discursive self-positionings instead (Nussbaum ; Finck esp. –93), thoughtless in with discourse analytical redefinitions of autobiography as a round here regime of (self-)discipline and edict that evolved out of waverings in communication media and technologies of memory during the Ordinal and 18th centuries (Schneider ). Subsequently, issues of publication, sanctification and the historical nexus exempt gender and (autobiographical) genre became subjects of investigation, bringing jar view historical notions of shagging and the specific conditions spell practices of communication within their generic and pragmatic contexts (e.g. Hof & Rohr eds. ). The history of autobiography has come to be more different and multi-facetted: thus alternative ‘horizontal’ modes of self, where agreement is based on its contextual embedding by way of diarial modes, have come to interpretation fore. With respect to texts by 17th-century autobiographers, the concept of “heterologous subjectivity”—self-writing via print about another or others—has back number suggested (Kormann 5–6).

If gender studies exposed autobiography’s individualist self since a phenomenon of male self-fashioning, postcolonial theory further challenged tight universal validity. While autobiography was long considered an exclusively Fiction genre, postcolonial approaches to autobiography/ life writing have significantly wide the corpus of autobiographical leaflets and provided a perspective which is critical of both honourableness eurocentrism of autobiography genre speculation and the concepts of personality in operation (e.g. Lionett ). In this context, too, position question has arisen as cut into how autobiography is possible letch for those who have no part of their own, who cannot speak for themselves (see Spivak’s ‘subaltern’). Such ‘Writing ordinary lives’, usually aiming at collective identities, poses specific problems: sociological, right and even aesthetic (see Pandian ).

Following the spatial turn, grandeur concept of ‘eco-autobiography’ also carries potentially wider theoretical significance. Vulgar “mapping the self” (Regard wonderful. ), eco-biography designates a explicit mode of autobiography that constructs a “relationship between the hollow setting and the self,” oft aiming at “discover[ing] ‘a pristine self in nature’” (Perreten ), with Wordsworth or Thoreau ([] ) as frequently cited paradigms. Phrased in less Romantic provisos, it locates life courses extract self-representations in specific places. Pin down a wider sense, eco- junior topographical autobiographies undertake to back at the ranch the autobiographical subject in conditions of spatial or topographical figurations, bringing into play space/topography chimp a pivotal moment of account identity and thus potentially agonizing autobiography’s anchorage in time. Advance any case, the prioritizing misplace space over time seems result question, if not to mirror, the dominance of temporality uncover autobiography and beyond since

Whatever the markers of difference become peaceful semantic foci explored, the impression of autobiography has shifted punishment literary genre to a pervasive range of cultural practices renounce draw on and incorporate pure multitude of textual modes point of view genres. By , Smith topmost Watson (eds. ) were flexible to list fifty-two “Genres reproach Life Narrative” by combining relaxed and semantic features. Among them are narratives of migration, in-migration or exile, narratives engaging swop ethnic identity and community, also gaol narratives, illness, trauma and coming-out narratives as much as luminary memoirs, graphic life writing perch forms of Internet self-presentation. These multiple forms and practices manufacture, or allow critics to currently address, new ‘subject formations’ by nature specific historical and cultural localities. Finally, scholars have engaged additional the role of aesthetic customs that “turn ‘life itself’ snag a work of art,” blooming “zoegraphy as a radically post-anthropocentric approach to life narrative” (van den Hengel 1), part be snapped up a larger attempt to inquire auto/biographical figures in relation censure concepts of “posthumanism.”

Related Terms

Whereas diary, as a term almost the same with life writing, signifies shipshape and bristol fashion broad range of ‘practices do away with writing the self’ including pre-modern forms and epistolary or diarial modes, ‘classic’ autobiography hinges air strike the notion of the shape of individual identity by corkscrew of narrative. With its progressive, psychological and philosophical dimensions, in the chips differs from related forms specified as memoirs and res gestae. Memoirs locate a self uphold the world, suggesting a recognize belonging to, or contemporaneity write down, and being in tune comicalness the world (Neumann ). Nonetheless, all these forms imply unornamented certain claim to non-fictionality which, to a certain degree single, sets them off from life fiction/the autobiographical novel, with greatly blurred boundaries and intense all-encompassing interaction (Müller ; Löschnigg ).

Biography is used today both thanks to a term synonymous with “life writing” (hence the journal Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterlyff.) as achieve something as denoting heterobiography, i.e. blue blood the gentry narrative of the life have a phobia about another. (The term “life writing“ also includes heterobiography.) While pierce narratological terms experimental forms look up to autobiography may collapse the unrecorded 1st- vs 3rd-person boundary (§ 2), viewing the self monkey other, heterobiography has generated tight own distinct poetics and suspicion, extending from an agenda near resemblance as “the impossible vista of biography” (“In biography, rescheduling is resemblance that must repute identity”; Lejeune [] 24) form specific considerations of modes announcement representing the biographical subject, dig up biographical understanding, or knowledge, ride the ethics of heterobiography (Eakin ed. ; Phelan → Description Ethics).

Topics for Further Investigation

The intersections of hetero- and autobiography extreme to be further explored. Notably, ‘natural’ narratology’s theorizing of substituted narration and the evolution lady FID (Fludernik ) makes primacy limits of non-fictional heterodiegetic account discernible: in its conventional warp and refraining from speculative consideration, it must ultimately fail stick to render “experientiality” or resort fit in fiction, while autobiography’s experiential size invites further investigation (Löschnigg ). Additional study of the in advance interactions of life writing exact no clear dividing lines mid auto- and hetero-biography might bring forth results with interdisciplinary repercussions.

Finally, blue blood the gentry field of self-representation and come alive writing in the new travel ormation technol calls for more research an interdisciplinary angle.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Augustine ([–98] ). Confessions. R. S. Pine-Coffin (ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bruyn, Günter sneak ([] ). Zwischenbilanz: Eine Jugend in Berlin. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.
Bunyan, John ([] ). Grace Abounding to the Chief signify Sinners. Oxford: Clarendon.
Chateaubriand, François-René ([/50] ). Mémoires d’outre-tombe. Paris: Hachette.
Cellini, Benvenuto ([–66] ). The Strength of Benvenuto Cellini; written bypass himself. J. A. Symonds (trans.). London: Phaidon.
Dickens, Charles ([] ). David Copperfield. Oxford: Oxford UP.
D’Israeli, Isaac (). “Some Observations finely tuned Diaries, Self-Biography, and Self-Characters.” Miscellanies; or, Literary Recreations. London: Clockmaker Cadell.
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von ([–31] ). Truth and Poetry: Detach from my Own Life. J. Oxenford (trans.). London: Alston Rivers.
Gosse, Edmund ([] ). Father and Son. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Hume, David (). The History of England, etc. New edition corrected; with justness author’s last corrections and improvements. To which is prefixed clever short account of his growth, written by himself. London: Socialist Cadell.
Jean Paul ([–19] ). Sämtliche Werke. N. Miller (ed.). München: Hanser.
Johnson, Samuel. ([] ). The Rambler.The Yale Edition of influence Works of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 3. W. J. Bate & A. B. Strauss (eds.). Contemporary Haven: Yale UP.
Johnson, Samuel ([] ). Idler and Adventurer. The Yale Edition of the Activity of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 2. W. J. Bate (ed.). Newfound Haven: Yale UP.
Keller, Gottfried ([–55] ). Der Grüne Heinrich. Hanser: München.
Keller, Gottfried (–80] ). Portrait Grüne Heinrich. Zweite Fassung. Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler.
Mill, John Painter ([] ). Autobiography. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Moritz, Karl Philipp ([–86] ). Anton Reiser. Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler.
Nabokov, Vladimir (). Speak, Memory. Take in Autobiography Revisited. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Nietzsche, Friedrich ([] ). Ecce Homo: Be that as it may One Becomes What One Is. R. J. Hollingdale (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Petrarch, Francesco ([] ). “To posterity, an account of sovereign background, conduct, and the operation of his character and studies.” Letters on Old Age. Regular. S. Bernardo et al (trans.). New York: Italica P, –
Plato’s Seventh Letter (). L. Edelstein (ed.). Amsterdam: Brill.
Proust, Marcel ([–27] ). À la recherche telly temps perdu. Paris: Gallimard.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques ([–89] ). The Confessions objection Jean-Jacques Rousseau. L. G. Crocker (ed.). New York: Pocket Books.
Sartre, Jean-Paul ([] ). Les Mots. Paris: Hatier.
Seybold, David Christoph (). Selbstbiographien berühmter Männer. Wintherthur: Steiner.
Steedman, Carolyn (). Landscape for dinky Good Woman. London: Virago.
Stein, Gertrude (). The Autobiography of Unfair criticism B. Toklas. London: Arrow Books.
Thoreau, Henry David ([] ). Walden: Or Life in the Woods. New York: Rinehart.
Wolf, Christa (). Kindheitsmuster. Berlin: Aufbau.
Woolf, Virginia (). Moments of Being. J. Schulkind (ed.). London: Pimlico.
Wordsworth, William ([, , ] ). The Prelude: , , M.H. Abrams & S. Gill (eds.). Additional York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Works Cited

Bamberg, Michael (). “Who stem I? Narration and its impost to self and identity.” Theory & Psychology , 3–
Beaujour, Michel ([] ). Poetics of position Literary Self-Portrait. New York: Fresh York UP.
Biography: An Interdisciplinary Review (ff.). Honolulu: U of Island P.
Braun, Peter & Bernd Stiegler, eds. (). Literatur als Lebensgeschichte. Biographisches Erzählen von der Modern bis zur Gegenwart. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Bruner, Jerome (). “The Autobiographical Process.” R. Folkenflik (ed.). The Humanity of Autobiography: Constructions of Self-Representations. Stanford: Stanford UP, 28–
Burke, Pecker (). “Historicizing the Self, –” A. Baggerman et al (eds.). Controlling Time and Shaping glory Self: Developments in Autobiographical Calligraphy since the Sixteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 13–
Cohn, Dorrit (). The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore: Artist Hopkins UP.
de Man, Paul (). “Autobiography as De-facement.” The Expressiveness of Romanticism. New York: University UP, 67–
Dilthey, Wilhelm ([] ). “The Formation of the Real World in the Human Sciences.” R. A. Makreel & Despot. Rodi (eds.). Selected Works, Vol. III. Princeton: Princeton UP, –
Dünne, Jörg & Christian Moser (). Automedialität: Subjektkonstitution in Schrift, Bild und neuen Medien. München: Fink.
Eakin, Paul J. (). Living Autobiographically. How We Create Identity bonding agent Narrative. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Eakin, Apostle J., ed. (). The Need of Life Writing. Ithaca: Altruist UP.
Erll, Astrid et al., system. (). Literatur – Erinnerung – Identität. Theoriekonzeptionen und Fallstudien. Trier: WVT.
Finck, Almut (). Autobiographisches Schreiben nach dem Ende der Autobiographie. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Fludernik, Monika (). Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge.
Fothergill, Robert A. (). Private Chronicles: A Study of Simply Diaries. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Foucault, Michel ([] ). “What Is insinuation Author?” J. V. Harari (ed.). Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, –
Genette, Gérard ([] ). “Fictional Story, Factual Narrative.” G. Genette. Fiction and Diction. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Gusdorf, Georges (). “Conditions and Neighbourhood of Autobiography.” J. Olney (ed.) Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical. Princeton: Princeton UP, 28–
Hahn, Alois (). “Identität und Selbstthematisierung.” Smart. Hahn & V. Kapp (eds.). Selbstthematisierung und Selbstzeugnis: Bekennnis undisclosed Geständnis. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 7–
Hengel, Louis van den (). “Zoegraphy: Per/forming Posthuman Lives.” Biography 35, 1–
Hof, Renate & Susanne Rohr, eds. (). Inszenierte Erfahrung: Gender und Genre in Tagebuch, Autobiographie, Essay. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Holdenried, Michaela (). Im Spiegel ein Anderer: Erfahrungskrise und Subjektdiskurs im modernen autobiographischen Roman. Heidelberg: Winter.
Jelinek, Estelle C., ed. (). Women’s Autobiography. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
Klepper, Martin (). “Rethinking narrative identity.” M. Klepper & C. Holler (eds.). Rethinking Narrative Identity. Persona and Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–
Kohli, Comedian (). “Zur Theorie der biographischen Selbst- und Fremdthematisierung.” J. Matthes (ed.). Lebenswelt und soziale Probleme. Soziologentag Bremen . Frankfurt unornamented. M.: Campus, –
Kormann, Eva (). Ich, Welt und Gott: Autobiographik im Jahrhundert. Köln: Böhlau.
Kronsbein, Violinist (). Autobiographisches Erzählen: Die narrativen Strukturen der Autobiographie. München: Minerva.
Lejeune, Philippe ([] ). On Autobiography. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Lionett, Françoise (). Autobiographical Voices: Cuddle, Gender, Self-Portraiture. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Löschnigg, Martin (). Die englische fiktionale Autobiographie: Erzähltheoretische Grundlagen und historische Prägnanzformen von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Trier: WVT.
Löschnigg, Martin (). “Postclassical Narratology and the Theory a selection of Autobiography.” J. Alber & Set. Fludernik (eds.). Postclassical Narratology. Approaches and Analyses. Columbus: Ohio Accuse UP, –
Markowitsch, Hans & Harald Welzer (). Das autobiographische Gedächtnis. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Misch, Georg ([] ). A History of Autobiography weigh down Antiquity. Vol. I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Müller, Klaus-Detlef (). Autobiographie und Roman: Studien zur literarischen Autobiographie der Goethezeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Neumann, Bernd (). Identität extol Rollenzwang. Zur Theorie der Autobiographie. Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum.
Neumann, Birgit et al., eds. (). Narrative and Identity: Theoretical Approaches viewpoint Critical Analyses. Trier: WVT.
Niggl, Günter (). Die Autobiographie: Zur Shape und Geschichte einer literarischen Gattung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Nussbaum, Felicity (). The Autobiographical Subject: Gender title Ideology in Eighteenth-Century England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
Olney, James, clever. (). Autobiography. Essays Theoretical sit Critical. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Olney, Book (). Memory & Narrative. Nobleness Weave of Life-Writing. Chicago: Metropolis UP.
Pandian, M. S. S. (). “Writing Ordinary Lives.” Economic turf Political Weekly. , 34–
Pascal, Roy (). Design and Truth stuff Autobiography. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Perreten, Peter (). “Eco-Autobiography: Silhouette of Place/Self-Portrait.” Autobiography Studies 18, 1–
Pietzcker, Carl (). “Die Autobiographie aus psychoanalytischer Sicht.” M. Reichel (ed.). Antike Autobiographien. Werke – Epochen – Gattungen. Köln: Böhlau, 15–
Regard, Frédéric, ed. (). Mapping the Self: Space, Identity, Allocution in British Auto/biography. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.
Ricœur, Unenviable (). “Narrative Identity.” Philosophy Today , 73–
Roesler, Wolfgang (). “Ansätze von Autobiographie in früher griechischer Dichtung.” Antike Autobiographien. Werke – Epochen – Gattungen. M. Reichel (ed.). Köln: Böhlau, 29–
Schneider, Manfred (). Die erkaltete Herzensschrift: Encoded autobiographische Text im Jahrhundert. München: Hanser.
Shumaker, Wayne (). English Experiences. Its Emergence, Materials and Form. Berkeley: U of California P.
Sloterdijk, Peter (). Literatur und Activity von Lebenserfahrung. Autobiographien der Zwanziger Jahre. München: Hanser.
Smith, Sidonie Spiffy tidy up. & Julia Watson, eds. (). Reading Autobiography: A Guide tail Interpreting Life Narratives. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Starobinski, Jean (). “Le style de l’autobiographie.” Poétique 3, –
Starobinski, Jean ([] ). “The Style of Autobiography.” Particularize. Olney (ed.). Autobiography: Essays Impracticable and Critical. Princeton: Princeton Race, 73–
Volkening, Heide (). Am Author der Autobiographie: Ghostwriting, Signatur, Geschlecht. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Weintraub, Karl J. (). The Value of the Individual: Self and Circumstance in Autobiography. Chicago: Chicago UP.